According
to a recent study by the National Bureau
for Economic Research, about half of all employers now offer the option of either a
traditional 401(k) retirement plan, where your employee contributions are made
pre-tax (though you’ll pay taxes on the money eventually), or a Roth 401(k),
where the contributions are included in your taxable income now so you won’t
pay taxes later when you’re actually using the money.
In
spite of the availability of both types of 401(k) plans, fewer than 9% of
workers with a 401(k) are opting for the Roth, even though they might not
understand the respective merits and risks of each option. Here’s some
information you can use decide for yourself which type of plan is best for you.
The
Basics
Let’s
run down the differences between these two retirement savings plans.
A
traditional 401(k) allows you to make pre-tax contributions to the account, which
gives you some tax savings today.
How to Face Your Fear of Starting a
401(k)
When I
was in high school, my father’s employer launched a 401(k) program. He’d been
there for twenty five years (off and on) at that time and was… Read…
So if
you earn $50,000 a year and contribute $5,000 annually to your 401(k),
you’re only taxed on $45,000 of income. Of course, you’ll have to pay taxes
eventually. When you withdraw the funds in retirement after age 59-1/2, the
withdrawals are considered ordinary income and the tax bill comes due.
Withdrawals before age 59-1/2 are subject to a 10% penalty, and you’d still
have to pay the taxes.
With a
Roth 401(k), your contributions are made after-tax, so there would be no
change to your taxable income for the year. But when you withdraw the funds,
they come out tax-free.
You can
take your contributions out anytime without facing taxes or penalties, but the
earnings in your account would have to stay until you’re 59-1/2—unless you’re
willing to pay that 10% penalty.
Both
account types have the same contribution limits:
$17,500 in 2013 for workers under age 50, and $23,000 for those 50 and older.
Your total contributions—whichever plan you choose—can’t exceed those limits on
an annual basis.
Your
employer may offer free money via “matching funds”—usually based on a percentage
of what you contribute. Matching funds must go into a traditional 401(k),
no matter where your personal contributions are invested.
Starting
at age 70-1/2 (or the year in which you retire, whichever is later), most
people must take required minimum
distributions (RMDs) from either a traditional or Roth 401(k), whether
or not you need the money.
Which to
Choose?How Much You Should Save for Retirement, Based on 139 Years of Data
With
the stock market constantly rising and falling, it's hard to predict what kind
of luck you'll have when you retire and how much you… Read…
The
attractiveness of tax-free funds in retirement may make Roths seem like a slam
dunk, but a lot will depend on the particulars of your finances.
If
you’re in a high tax bracket today, you may not want to
give up the chance to reduce your taxable income through contributions to a
traditional 401(k). Plus, if you expect to be in a lower tax bracket in
retirement, making the tax payments sometime in the future may be a better bet.
If
you’re young, a Roth may be more enticing. If you’re just starting in your
career and not earning a high salary, you’re probably not paying all that much
in taxes. That means you probably wouldn’t reap much benefit from lower taxable
income today thanks to pre-tax contributions to a traditional 401(k).
The
Roth is also attractive if you think tax rates, in general, will rise in the
future. We don’t know the future of taxes, but it doesn’t take a crystal ball
to see rates won’t plummet any time soon.
Here’s
another consideration: If you’ve already built up a sizable nest egg, and you
think you’re not going to spend it all in retirement, you may want to use a
Roth as a savings strategy to build up a tax-free inheritance for your heirs.
By the
Numbers
We
tested a few scenarios to see the difference a Roth might make to the future
retirement incomes of John Q. Investor.
John
wants to estimate the difference in his retirement income if he saves in a Roth
401(k) or a traditional 401(k). He earns $50,000 a year, which puts him in the
25% tax bracket. He contributes $5,000 per year to his 401(k). The account
earns an average of 8% a year while he’s working, and he expects it will earn
6% a year after he retires.
If John
starts saving at age 25, a Roth would give him $23,770 more in annual
retirement income than he’d have if he saved in a traditional 401(k).
If he
starts saving at 45, John will still make out slightly better with a Roth, able
to enjoy an extra $4,190 a year in retirement income.
Remember,
the Roth isn’t the winner for every situation, so try out some comparison
calculators to see exactly how you’d do with each type of plan. This one from Charles Schwab allows
you to account for several factors, while this one from BankRate shows
what can happen if those with traditional 401(k) plans can earn if they invest
the initial tax savings.
Am I
Stuck with What I Have?
While
most people can’t roll Roth 401(k) earnings into a traditional 401(k), recent
changes allow you to roll your traditional plan into a Roth. Of course, that
means you’ll be hit with taxes starting that year. You won’t pay any penalties,
but you should check to see if doing away with the pre-tax contributions will
bump you into a higher tax bracket.
Of
course, you can only roll your traditional 401(k) into a Roth if your employer
offers the Roth. These plans have only been around since 2006, so they are still
gaining in popularity among employers. And as mentioned above, employers’
matching contributions to a 401(k) must go into a traditional plan, which leads
us to…
Splitting
the Difference
Depending
on your employer, you may not have to choose one or the other. Some employers
allow you to split your contributions between the Roth and traditional options.
Just remember that between the two plans, you still can’t exceed the total
contribution limit for the year.
When my
husband’s employer first offered a Roth 401(k), we jumped in with both feet, or
more accurately, with all his contributions. But when our tax bill came due the
following year, we realized we missed the tax savings of the pre-tax
contributions—big time.
So we
decided instead to split the contributions—half in the Roth, half in the
traditional— which would give us the best of both worlds. Plus, it will give us
choices when it comes to withdrawing funds in retirement—tax
diversification—something we’ll probably appreciate when we’re in our golden years.
No comments:
Post a Comment